Grid Reliability · Published
Underwriting Interconnection in a Constrained Grid
Why grid access, not generation cost, determines which renewable projects reach commercial operation, and how we underwrite interconnection risk explicitly.

Key takeaways
- · Interconnection is a schedule risk, a revenue risk and a cost risk simultaneously.
- · CERC's August 2026 draft relief on transmission charges for grid-delayed projects confirms the constraint is systemic.
- · We underwrite the transmission element's schedule as carefully as the project's own.
The constraint moved upstream
Generation cost stopped being the limiting factor in most of our markets some years ago. The limiting factor now is the wire. India is building to a plan that contemplates integrating roughly 537 GW of renewable capacity by 2030, with CTUIL's rolling plan projecting about INR 3.42 trillion of interstate transmission capital expenditure to FY30. Even at that pace, delivery has lagged connection demand — which is why in August 2026 CERC published a draft proposal extending transmission-charge waiver relief to renewable projects delayed by grid constraints, partially rolling back the ISTS waiver phase-out begun in July 2025.
What queue position actually tells you
A queue position is a claim on capacity at a named node, conditional on the upstream network being built and on prior positions either progressing or lapsing. We diligence the grant letter and its conditions, bay allocation, the associated transmission element and its awarded status, the bank guarantee and milestone regime, and the historical rate at which positions at that node have converted into energised connections.
- · A connectivity grant with unmet conditions is a conditional grant.
- · Node-level congestion history is more informative than system-level statistics.
- · Lapsing rules cut both ways — they can free capacity or forfeit yours.
Interconnection is a schedule risk, a revenue risk and a cost risk simultaneously.
Curtailment exposure
Curtailment is underwritten from three angles: the physical likelihood at the node, the contractual allocation in the PPA and connection agreement, and the compensation mechanism if it occurs. Where a project's economics depend on the assumption of negligible curtailment, we test that assumption against observed dispatch data rather than against the developer's expectation.
Transmission charges and policy reversal risk
Transmission charge treatment can move a project's economics materially, and the Indian experience since 2025 demonstrates that both the imposition and the relief can arrive by regulatory instrument within a single year. We model the charge regime as a live variable with an explicit sensitivity, not as a fixed input.
Contractual alignment
The commonest structural error we see is a PPA commissioning obligation that is not aligned with the connectivity date, exposing the developer to liquidated damages for a delay caused by the network owner. Alignment — or an express carve-out — is checked before any other commercial term is negotiated.
Where the opportunity sits
Constraint creates value for assets that relieve it: storage at congested nodes, firm and dispatchable portfolios, projects with secured connectivity in a market where connectivity is scarce, and transmission-adjacent infrastructure. A secured grid position is now one of the few genuinely scarce assets in renewable development.
Sources
- 1. CEA transmission plan for integration of 500 GW non-fossil capacity, covering the network roadmap for approximately 537 GW of renewable capacity by 2030 — Central Electricity Authority / India Transmission Portal, Accessed August 2026. Source
- 2. CTUIL Interim ISTS Rolling Plan 2029-30 projects roughly INR 3.42 trillion of interstate transmission capital expenditure to FY30 — CTUIL, reported by T&D India, 14 October 2024. Source
- 3. CERC draft proposal to extend interstate transmission charge waiver relief to renewable projects delayed by grid constraints, partially reversing the waiver phase-out that began in July 2025 — Mercom India, 3 August 2026. Source
- 4. Around 43 GW of awarded renewable capacity awaiting buyers; government and SECI targeting power sale agreements for 10–12 GW in the first half of FY27, with pricing and contractual terms reworked — The Financial Express, 10 April 2026. Source
- 5. 10.4 GW of standalone BESS allocated in 2025; standalone tenders were over 71% of capacity tendered; lowest two-hour tariff of INR 1.48 lakh/MW/month; roughly 75% of allocated two-hour capacity classified at-risk on viability — IEEFA and JMK Research, May 2026. Source
- · Regulatory developments are cited to public reporting on the dates shown and may have progressed since.
Important limitations
- · Draft regulatory proposals are not final rules and should not be relied upon as such.
- · General framework; grid regimes differ materially between markets.